How we assess Harvest
This review looks at Harvest the way an agency would weigh it up — its features, pricing and plans, integrations, how it fits the work agencies do day to day, and what users say about it. Everything below is scored on ease of use, feature depth, how well it scales with clients, and price.
- Time tracking and invoicing in one tool
- Bill clients straight from logged hours
- Built-in expense tracking
- Free for a single seat
- Reliable and well established
- Reporting less flexible than Toggl
- Interface feels dated in places
- Fewer power features than dedicated PM tools
Our verdict on Harvest
Harvest closes the loop that Toggl leaves open: it tracks time and then invoices from it, in the same tool. For an agency that bills by the hour, that means a team member logs work against a client, and at month end you turn those hours straight into an invoice — no export, no re-keying, no reconciliation between two systems. That single workflow is the reason to choose it.
Expense tracking is built in too, so project costs and billable time sit together and the invoice reflects the full picture. It is mature and dependable, the kind of tool you set up once and stop thinking about, which is exactly what you want from the thing that gets you paid.
The trade-offs are polish and flexibility. The reporting is less malleable than Toggl, and parts of the interface show their age. If invoicing from time is core, those are easy to live with; if you only need the timer, Toggl is sharper. Free for one seat, then from around $11/user/mo. Confirm current pricing on the vendor site.
Harvest in depth
Ease of use & setup
Harvest scores 8.6/10 for ease of use — straightforward for a lean team to adopt without much hand-holding. We judge this on how fast a small agency team gets productive and whether they keep using it once the novelty wears off.
Scales with clients
On the agency-fit features, Harvest offers time + invoicing. Client portal / guest access: yes; white-label: no. It scales fine for a handful of clients, less so at high volume.
Feature depth & pricing
Pricing model: Free for 1 seat, starting Free, then $11/user/mo. There is a free plan, so you can prove the value before paying. Feature depth is solid for agency work. Confirm current pricing on the vendor site before you commit.
Automation, integrations & API
Automation & workflows: no. Integrations: no. API & Zapier: yes. Harvest is lighter on built-in automation, so plan for some manual steps. The API and Zapier support make it straightforward to wire into the rest of your stack.
Who Harvest is (and isn't) for
Best for: Agencies that want to bill clients directly from tracked time. Where it's the wrong call: reporting less flexible than toggl; interface feels dated in places; fewer power features than dedicated pm tools. If those trade-offs don't touch how your agency works, Harvest earns its 82/100 Index Score.
What Harvest costs
| Free plan | Yes — try it before you pay |
|---|---|
| Starts from | Free, then $11/user/mo |
| Value score | 8.4/10 |
| Best entry offer | Free plan (1 seat) |
Plans and credit limits change often — pricing shown is as of 2026-06-09. Always confirm on the vendor's site.
See live Harvest pricing ↗How Harvest scores
Harvest FAQ
What is Harvest best for?
Agencies that bill from tracked time. Harvest combines time tracking, expenses and invoicing in one tool, so you can turn logged hours straight into client invoices.
Toggl Track or Harvest?
Toggl is the sharper, simpler pure timer; Harvest adds invoicing and expenses. Pick Toggl if you just need tracking, Harvest if you want to bill clients directly from the hours.
